Tuesday, 23 February 2016
Pictures for Schools talk, Manchester Metropolitan University, Wednesday March 16, 6.30pm
Pictures for Schools: Bringing art to Manchester's post-war classrooms
Pictures for Schools was a scheme founded in 1947, which aimed to get original works of art into ‘schools of every kind’ so children could grow up with art as part of their everyday environments.
Between 1947 and 1969, annual Pictures for Schools exhibitions were held in London (with the exception of 1957, when a venue in London could not be found and the exhibition was instead held at Manchester’s Whitworth Art Gallery). Here, contemporary artworks by living British artists were displayed and sold at prices affordable to educational buyers. Contributors ranged from well-known names such as LS Lowry to students who were obscure at the time but later went on to make a name for themselves.
Local education authorities, education committees and museum services across the country made the annual trip from London to make purchases from the scheme, and extensive collections of artworks were built up in towns, cities and counties large and small for loan to schools. Several schools in Manchester benefited from the opportunity to buy work, and education committees in Lancashire, Rochdale and Manchester were among the regular buyers from Pictures for Schools. Another purchaser was Manchester Art Gallery’s Rutherston Loan Collection for educational institutions in the north of England.
However, over the decades schools have closed, changed name or merged, and local authorities have come under pressures such as boundary changes and financial constraints. Many of these collections have now disappeared with little or no acknowledgment that such a service once existed. Does Pictures for Schools have a legacy in Manchester today, and can these artworks still have any relevance in the twentieth-first-century classroom?
The talk will take place on Wednesday March 16, 6.30pm, in Room 307, 3rd floor, Geoffrey Manton Building, Manchester Metropolitan University, Oxford Road, Manchester M15.
Free; all welcome
Facebook event
Friday, 23 September 2011
The 'public art' of Ford Madox Brown: Manchester's town hall murals
When the murals were painted, says Julian, the town hall would have been more accessible (although, he admits, “the very, very poor would not have got through its door”) as it was regularly used as a venue for public meetings. Waterhouse intended art to be an integral part of the building, with murals throughout – though this eventually proved to costly and time-consuming as Brown's murals in the great hall alone took fifteen years to complete.
Commissioning murals for the building at all was, says Julian, an act of “complete daring” by the architect following the failure of similar schemes in the Houses of Parliament (Brown's proposals for the Houses of Parliament murals, which were not chosen, are in the Manchester Art Gallery show) and the Oxford Union which, unsuited the the UK's damp climate, soon faded. Waterhouse learned from this and the preparation for murals in Manchester town hall was carefully thought out. Hot air was installed behind the spaces where the murals would go, and stained glass kept to a minimum, free of flashy colours that would shine onto and distract from the paintings. A Gambier Parry style of spirit fresco was chosen, and the walls prepared so that the pigment would react with the surface of the walls – making them “truly architectural, not easel painting”, says Julian, as “they're meant to tell at a distance in this space”.
Whilst Waterhouse tried to ensure the murals were a success technically, Brown faced other difficulties. Winning the town hall commission is described by Julian as a 'lifeline' for Brown in the last years of his life, but it was not easy: he suffered from gout and ailments brought about by the cold in the building in winter and a stroke meant the loss temporarily of the use of his right hand. Nor did the council offer their unfailing support, vetoing his plan to end the series of murals with a depiction of the Peterloo Massacre. His painting of the opening of the Bridgewater Canal was also unpopular, with its pomp and circumstance and bright, bawdy colours.
Many of the events in the murals have only a “tenuous link to Manchester” as, explains Julian, “Manchester did not really have a history with lots of heroic events and great personalities.” A Roman Fort is built in Mancenion by a worker writhing with tattoos. Christianity is brought to Manchester following the baptism of King Edwin at York. Closer to home the Fly Shuttle is discovered at Bury, jeered by baying luddites. The world famous scientist John Dalton's discovery of natural gases, a pastoral scene, is overlooked by a curious, almost-cartoonish cow. Brown intended the murals to be 'typical' of Manchester's history rather than 'documentary'. In some cases he even imagines how the future might be, envisaging crowds of children at Humphrey Chetham's school. Animals and children recur throughout the pictures, which are often light-hearted. As Julian says, Brown's paintings are humorous, containing “a lot of fun and wit and satire”. He is “anti-hierarchy and egalitarian” as an artist and “emphasises role of ordinary people, has a lot of fun at the expense of authority figures.” He paints his friends, family and patrons into the pictures – and even himself as the Archbishop of Canterbury.
As the accompanying exhibition at Manchester Art Gallery shows, Brown was in his element as a storyteller. Passionate about literature, he often depicted scenes from Shakespeare and other great works, for example creating series of narrative stained glass windows both for churches and private houses.
Brown believed in “equality between the fine and decorative arts”, designing many of the frames for his paintings, and the exhibition also displays examples of his furniture. He also excelled as a portrait painter, eliciting a candid directness from his sitters, among them Madeleine Scott, daughter of the famous Guardian editor CP Scott, perched atop a then-fashionable tricycle. Another of his most striking paintings, 'Mauvais Sujet (The Writing Lesson)', which depicts a sensuous young girl biting into an apple, her hair in disarray, shows Brown's concern for society: proceeds went to Lancashire Relief Fund to help those affected by the Lancashire cotton famine.
Brown's talent for storytelling and portraiture combine in pictures such as the vivid 'Last of England', where you can see the steely determination on the emigrants' faces, and 'Work', one of his best known paintings. Described by Julian as showing “a humble incident – the type you wouldn't have been allowed to exhibit in the Royal Academy”, it comprises a street scene based around the laying of a sewer in London. Presented is a cross-section of nineteenth century life, from the rich on horseback to workers bent over in toil, right down to the unemployed, beggars and the very poor – those who had to sell wild plants such as chickweed in the street. In the background, layers of advertisements on the wall show the concerns of the time and reflect Brown's interests, including posters for workers' colleges, and the scene is watched over by the social thinker Thomas Carlyle. As Julian explains: “Ford Madox Brown challenged prevailing ideas of what art should be. Victorian artists were governed by decorum. They did not paint life as we saw it in the street.”
At £8 for entry, perhaps the Art Gallery show is suited to enthusiasts. But even when the exhibition has finished, the town hall murals are accessible to the public – just ask at the front desk and, as long as there are no events on, you should be able to wander the great hall at your will.Ford Madox Brown: Pre-Raphaelite Pioneer, opens at Manchester Art Gallery, Mosley Street, on Saturday September 24 and runs until Sunday January 29 2011. Entry is £8 for adults, £6 for concessions and free for under-18s.
Photos used by permission of Manchester Art Gallery (click for larger images)
Wednesday, 5 May 2010
A World Observed 1940 - 2010: Photographs by Dorothy Bohm, Manchester Art Gallery
“Photographs alter and enlarge our notions of what is worth looking at, and what we have a right to observe.”Susan Sontag, On Photography
There’s a curious contrast in her portraits though, which range from commissioned portraits taken at Studio Alexander to street snaps of people caught seemingly unawares. Although her Studio Alexander portraits, often commemorating special occasions, are lovely, snapshots of a long-passed age, it’s the photos of people who don’t seem to know — or care — she’s there that are the most interesting.

Her studio subjects all share the same soft, misty, blurry facial expression. Looking away from the camera, it’s as if they’re imagining some kind of faraway place. Just as we’re looking at her posed portraits through the distance of time and place, so it seems as if, even at the time, the sitters were not quite really there, but projecting themselves into an fictitious scenario just over their shoulder. Photographs invite us to imagine the circumstances of the subject — yet it’s as if the subjects themselves are imagining themselves elsewhere.
Far more interesting are those photos which seem to be thrown up by chance, from a tramp asleep under a bridge in Paris to the weary, end of day face of the fishmonger resting on a bench at Billingsgate Market next to his wares. As Susan Sontag once noted, ‘photographs do not explain, they acknowledge’. We’re left to either explain through creating imaginary stories around them, or just appreciate the photos for what they are — a relic of life at one particular moment in time.
In one scene, a man rushes through Covent Garden, past two cartoonish, theatrical cut outs of actors on the front of the theatre museum, an anonymous blur against the street. Read the small print on a poster for the museum and it says ‘I could kick myself for having walked past so many times. It’s wonderful.’ Likewise, Bohm captures the type of moments that are life’s small print, unnoticeable to all but those who are prepared to look that closely. These are the patterns and small repetitions forged everyday, from the lattice formed by uneven paving stones to the grids of light cast by windows onto a neighbouring building.

Although there are shots of the swinging ‘60s and ‘70s, replete with youth fashion, Bohm’s camera complements best the faces of the very old or the very young, perhaps because they’re at their least self-aware, unconcerned with how the rest of the world sees them. Sometimes, this process of deciding what’s worth looking at is presented ironically — as in the photo of a street artist painting a sitter, which makes the act of creating a portrait as interesting as the portrait itself. Similarly, a picture of a group of punters viewing — through binoculars all pointing in the same direction — the Goodwood Races, suggests the act of watching is more exciting than the event itself.
Of course, you can’t capture a person in a photo, only a person at any one particular moment, framed in time. For this reason, my favourite photo in the exhibition is a dapper gentleman in a hat rushing past a row of carcasses hanging in a window, an odd juxtaposition he may not even have noticed at the time but which is forever preserved in one small, photographic slice of the world.A World Observed 1940-2010: Photographs by Dorothy Bohm
Manchester Art Gallery
Mosley Street
Manchester
M2 3JL
Until Monday August 30.
www.manchesterartgallery.org


